By mixing the two principles, polity aims to balance the interests of the many and the few, creating a regime governed by law rather than the shifting whims of a majority. In this context, democracy, when purified and moderated through elements of oligarchy and aristocracy, could contribute to a stable and flourishing city, which is the ultimate purpose of political association.
Aristotle's Regime Authority and the Structure of Balanced Governance
He observed that democracies operate on the principle of numerical equality, where the majority, regardless of virtue or competence, determines the laws. This inherent instability stems from the regime’s failure to cultivate the moral character necessary for self-governance.
When citizens chafe under any form of authority, they gravitate toward democratic equality. Contrast with Polity and the Ideal of the Mixed Constitution Aristotle’s preference lay not in pure democracy but in polity, a constitution that blends democratic and oligarchic elements.
Aristotle's Analysis of Regime Authority and Governance Structure
His analysis, rooted in empirical observation and teleological reasoning, sought to classify constitutions based on their true aim—whether they served the interest of the whole city or the factional interest of the rulers. Their corrupt counterparts, which prioritize the interest of the rulers, are tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy.
More About Aristotle view on democracy
Looking at Aristotle view on democracy from another angle can help expand the discussion and give readers a second clear paragraph under the same section.
More perspective on Aristotle view on democracy can make the topic easier to follow by connecting earlier points with a few simple takeaways.
